Note the movements in substantial shareholders 2007-11. Sourced from Annual Reports 2007-11 and ASX to Jan 13, 2012.
TABLE 1 SeeTABLE 2 below for full details of the Orbis 18.46%
Holder
|
Aug
2007
|
Aug 2008
|
Aug
2009
|
Aug 2010
|
Aug 2011
|
Jan 10 2012
|
Orbis ^
|
5.02
|
12.61
|
12.96
|
18.46
|
18.46
|
|
Maple-Brown Abbot ^^
|
10.00
|
12.59
|
12.36
|
12.36
|
12.36
|
9.15
|
Schroder Investment
|
5.06
|
10.30
|
10.30
|
11.02
|
11.02
|
|
DFA Group ^^^
|
5.02
|
|||||
AXA Group
|
10.03
|
15.22
|
||||
BT Investment
|
6.42
|
|||||
Capital Group
|
5.02
|
|||||
Commonwealth Bank
|
6.02
|
|||||
Franklin Resources Inc
|
5.01
|
|||||
National Australia Bank
|
9.63
|
9.88
|
||||
Suncorp Metway
|
9.74
|
6.36
|
||||
25.05
|
37.89
|
61.06
|
62.89
|
46.86
|
38.63
|
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
%
|
^ Read more about Orbis and it's PaperlinX holdings here and commentary by John Durie in The Australian here.
^^ Maple-Brown Abbott reduced it's holding from 12.36% to 10.90% on Jan 10, 2012 then to 9.15% on Jan 19. See ASX Notice.
^^^ DFA Group ceased to be a substantial shareholder on October 11, 2011.
^^ Maple-Brown Abbott reduced it's holding from 12.36% to 10.90% on Jan 10, 2012 then to 9.15% on Jan 19. See ASX Notice.
^^^ DFA Group ceased to be a substantial shareholder on October 11, 2011.
Looking at movements in substantial shareholdings since
2007:
·
During
the equities bull market, most institutions avoided PPX as it was an
underperformer;
·
During
the GFC, some institutions favoured PPX as a value and defensive stock, which
is what it should be;
·
Since
2010, the institutions have abandoned PPX save for the three long suffering
trapped holders;
·
Apparently
Orbis bought the ‘Marchant means change’ story in late 2010 which probably accounts
for its bleating now;
·
Lots
of instos, Australian & USA, have been burned; and
·
The
only recent buyers are small scale bottom-feeders.
Conclusion: Substantial shareholders usually act rationally.
| Price | Date | Prev |
Change | New | % |
AveSP | $M |
# |
| 1.515 | 15/07/2008 | 0 | 22,729,231 | 22,729,231 | 5.02 | 1.515 | 0.0 | |
| 0.720 | 19/12/2008 | 22,729,231 | 14,840,194 | 37,569,425 | 6.22 | 1.201 | -18.1 | |
| 0.685 | 7/01/2009 | 37,569,425 | 6,359,524 | 43,928,949 | 7.28 | 1.126 | -19.4 | |
| 0.485 | 22/01/2009 | 43,928,949 | 6,844,084 | 50,773,033 | 8.41 | 1.040 | -28.2 | |
| 0.505 | 3/06/2009 | 50,773,033 | 6,260,904 | 57,033,937 | 9.45 | 0.981 | -27.2 | |
| 0.445 | 22/06/2009 | 57,033,937 | 6,577,020 | 63,610,957 | 10.54 | 0.926 | -30.6 | |
| 0.405 | 3/07/2009 | 63,610,957 | 6,337,976 | 69,948,933 | 11.59 | 0.879 | -33.1 | |
| 0.480 | 10/08/2009 | 69,948,933 | 6,176,317 | 76,125,250 | 12.81 | 0.846 | -27.9 | |
| 0.640 | 14/10/2009 | 76,125,250 | 8,661,790 | 84,787,040 | 14.05 | 0.825 | -15.7 | |
| 0.575 | 21/10/2009 | 84,787,040 | 6,352,305 | 91,139,345 | 15.10 | 0.808 | -21.2 | |
| 0.765 | 15/04/2010 | 91,139,345 | -6,384,499 | 84,754,846 | 14.04 | 0.811 | -3.9 | |
| 0.820 | 23/04/2010 | 84,754,846 | -6,509,626 | 78,245,220 | 12.96 | 0.810 | 0.8 | 1 |
| 0.420 | 19/10/2010 | 78,245,220 | 7,576,311 | 85,821,531 | 14.22 | 0.776 | -30.5 | 2 |
| 0.420 | 18/11/2010 | 85,821,531 | 6,820,700 | 92,642,231 | 15.35 | 0.750 | -30.5 | |
| 0.410 | 24/11/2010 | 92,642,231 | 6,091,937 | 98,734,168 | 16.36 | 0.729 | -31.5 | |
| 0.415 | 2/12/2010 | 98,734,168 | 6,470,639 | 105,204,807 | 17.43 | 0.709 | -31.0 | |
| 0.435 | 2/03/2011 | 105,204,807 | 6,227,203 | 111,432,010 | 18.46 | 0.694 | -28.9 | 3 |
| 0.065 | 13/01/2012 | 111,432,010 | -70.1 | 4 |
Notes to TABLE 2
#1 Orbis sells down to 12.96% near market top in April 2010
#2 Recommenced buying after Toby Marchant appointed MD on Oct 1, 2010
#3 Last buy just before the final big drop in price - see 85% Freefall Chart Here
#3 Estimated average purchase price 69.4 cents
#4 Estimated loss at January 13, 2012 is $70.1 million
#5 See PPX vs ASX200 since 2000 here and question why anyone is still invested?
PXUPA Register
We hold a copy of the register.
Expanding upon the details provided in the Top 20 Holders provided in the 2011 Financial Report of PaperlinX SPS Trust here, we provide an extract from the register as at December 11, 2011.
TABLE 3
Holding
|
No.
|
Units
|
% of Total
|
≥ 9,000
|
44
|
1,436,436
|
50.40%
|
≥ 2,500 & < 9,000
|
106
|
450,134
|
15.79%
|
< 2,500
|
2,245
|
963,430
|
33.81%
|
2,395
|
2,850,000
|
100.00%
|
Two key issues:
1. Distressed-debt hedge funds still haven’t appeared on the PXUPA register. Yet there is cash sloshing around looking for deals - see "Next distressed-debt targets in sight" AFR June 21, 2011; and
2. If PXUPA holders desire, it won’t be difficult to muster sufficient holders to call an EGM.
Twitter: @PaperlinXsuX
Ed,
ReplyDeleteHow many hybrid shares, or percentage of shares, does the largest hybrid holder have? I think it is less than 5%
How up to date is your info.
Ed: As above - December 11, 2011. The largest held 14.89% at that time. The top 5-6 is fairly stable.
ReplyDeleteWhy do you ask?
Thatmust be JPMogan group.
ReplyDeleteFor special resolution 75%must agree.
Can you track down Brad Newcombe? He left FIIG about 2 months ago.
He will be able to say whether PaperlinX can officially offer hybrid holder less than $100 and still offer ordinary shareholders 9 cents per share.
I can't see why ordinary shareholder get anything as hybrids rank higher.
What do you think?
Ed,
ReplyDeleteAre all 6 biggest hybrid holder, also large ordinary shareholder?
If they are it will make it easier for Paperlinx to pass special resolutions in favour of ordinary shareholders.
Ed,
ReplyDeleteWhy don't you get advise from the funds managers of the bi hybrid holders.
They will be watching pxupa with great interest.
They will never publish anything on this site, but you can do some journalism.
Is it right that we will not get $100 per unit?
Ed: The top institutional holders of PPX & PXUPA are quite different because of their respective investment mandates; ie Equity versus Fixed Income. So no problems there. Yes, JPMogan is the top holder.
ReplyDeleteRe Brad Newcombe; I know how to contact him by phone and email; and we talk. Best Brad speak for himself.
I might add that anyone can read the trust deed and glean the answers. Why do you think I'm putting so much time into this?
Supporters of SuX have well enough units to call an EGM of the SPS Trust. Not hard to gather support when people are ripped off.
Cheers
Can you kindly forward to me Brads email address?
ReplyDeleteBut don't publish it for everyone to see.
Ed: No way. Please read Whistle-blowers HERE. I'm maintaining strict confidentiality for everyone.
ReplyDeleteIf you send me your FULL DETAILS, I'll forward them to Brad for him to make a decision.
Trust you respect the need for this.
Thats fine. What is your email address?
ReplyDeletepaperlinxsux@gmail.com
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteYou people need a life
ReplyDelete